TY - JOUR
T1 - Using managed aquifer recharge to address land subsidence
T2 - Insights from a global literature review
AU - Seidl, Constantin
AU - Page, Declan
AU - Wheeler, Sarah Ann
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) – through mitigating groundwater over-extraction – has been used as a tool to mitigate land subsidence in many regions around the world. However, given that to date, MAR has not been used to its full potential as a water resource management tool, then subsequently MAR for land subsidence mitigation (MAR-LS) is also underutilized. This paper reviews the MAR and MAR-LS literature using three approaches. Firstly, we review a global case study database of 314 MAR schemes from 172 studies to examine whether non-trial MAR-LS schemes are different to other MAR schemes in technology, management, and effectiveness. To explore socio-economic and other influences on MAR-LS effectiveness, we complement this with a comparison of economic assessments of MAR and MAR-LS schemes to explore potential unique economic and financial characteristics and how they influence effectiveness. And finally, we undertake a detailed case study review of the effectiveness and issues with MAR-LS schemes in Shanghai, Las Vegas, and Mexico City, shedding light on aspects not captured by the previous two assessments. A range of relevant MAR insights and findings are provided to foster future successful MAR-LS implementation.
AB - Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) – through mitigating groundwater over-extraction – has been used as a tool to mitigate land subsidence in many regions around the world. However, given that to date, MAR has not been used to its full potential as a water resource management tool, then subsequently MAR for land subsidence mitigation (MAR-LS) is also underutilized. This paper reviews the MAR and MAR-LS literature using three approaches. Firstly, we review a global case study database of 314 MAR schemes from 172 studies to examine whether non-trial MAR-LS schemes are different to other MAR schemes in technology, management, and effectiveness. To explore socio-economic and other influences on MAR-LS effectiveness, we complement this with a comparison of economic assessments of MAR and MAR-LS schemes to explore potential unique economic and financial characteristics and how they influence effectiveness. And finally, we undertake a detailed case study review of the effectiveness and issues with MAR-LS schemes in Shanghai, Las Vegas, and Mexico City, shedding light on aspects not captured by the previous two assessments. A range of relevant MAR insights and findings are provided to foster future successful MAR-LS implementation.
KW - Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR)
KW - Land subsidence
KW - Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)
KW - Ground subsidence
KW - Groundwater
KW - Water management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206439542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100184
DO - 10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100184
M3 - Review article
SN - 2468-3124
VL - 23
JO - Water Security
JF - Water Security
M1 - 100184
ER -