Using managed aquifer recharge to address land subsidence: Insights from a global literature review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) – through mitigating groundwater over-extraction – has been used as a tool to mitigate land subsidence in many regions around the world. However, given that to date, MAR has not been used to its full potential as a water resource management tool, then subsequently MAR for land subsidence mitigation (MAR-LS) is also underutilized. This paper reviews the MAR and MAR-LS literature using three approaches. Firstly, we review a global case study database of 314 MAR schemes from 172 studies to examine whether non-trial MAR-LS schemes are different to other MAR schemes in technology, management, and effectiveness. To explore socio-economic and other influences on MAR-LS effectiveness, we complement this with a comparison of economic assessments of MAR and MAR-LS schemes to explore potential unique economic and financial characteristics and how they influence effectiveness. And finally, we undertake a detailed case study review of the effectiveness and issues with MAR-LS schemes in Shanghai, Las Vegas, and Mexico City, shedding light on aspects not captured by the previous two assessments. A range of relevant MAR insights and findings are provided to foster future successful MAR-LS implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100184
Number of pages12
JournalWater Security
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR)
  • Land subsidence
  • Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)
  • Ground subsidence
  • Groundwater
  • Water management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using managed aquifer recharge to address land subsidence: Insights from a global literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this