Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: Findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial

G Kolt, Richard Rosenkranz, Corneel Vandelanotte, C Caperchione, Anthony Maeder, R Tague, T Savage, Anetta Van Itallie, W Mummery, Christopher Oldmeadow, Mitch Duncan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)


Background/Aim Web 2.0 internet technology has great potential in promoting physical activity. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour, and the impact on website usage and engagement. Methods 504 (328 women, 126 men) insufficiently active adult participants were randomly allocated to one f two web-based interventions or a paper-based Logbook group. The Web 1.0 group participated in the existing 10 000 Steps programme, while the Web 2.0 group participated in a Web 2.0-enabled physical activity intervention including user-to-user interaction through social networking capabilities. ActiGraph GT3X activity monitors were used to assess physical activity at four points across the intervention (0, 3, 12 and 18 months), and usage and engagement were assessed continuously through website usage statistics. Results Treatment groups differed significantly in trajectories of minutes/day of physical activity (p=0.0198), through a greater change at 3 months fo Web 2.0 than Web 1.0 (7.3 min/day, 95% CI 2.4 to 12.3). In the Web 2.0 group, physical activity increased at 3 (mean change 6.8 min/day, 95% CI 3.9 to 9.6) and 12 months (3.8 min/day, 95% CI 0.5 to 7.0), but not 18 months. The Logbook group also increased physical activity at 3 (4.8 min/day, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.7) and 12 months (4.9 min/day, 95% CI 0.7 to 9.1), but not 18 months. The Web 1.0 group increased physical activity at 12 months only (4.9 min/day, 95% CI 0.5 to 9.3). The Web 2.0 group demonstrated higher levels of website engagement (p=0.3964).Conclusions In comparison to a Web 1.0 intervention, a more interactive Web 2.0 intervention, as well as the paper-based Logbook intervention, improved physicalactivity in the short term, but that effect reduced over time, despite higher levels of engagement of the Web 2.0 group. Trial registration number ACTRN12611000157976.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1433-1440
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Issue number19
Early online date2017
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: Findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this