Abstract
Serum anti-Ro60 is one the most frequently encountered autoantibodies in the diagnostic immunopathology laboratory and in clinical practice. A large variety of assays are available to detect this including the popular multiplex line immunoblot (IB) assay.
We evaluated the analytical performance of the IB for anti-Ro60 detection, using the counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) method as the ‘gold standard’. We also undertook a survey of international laboratories, who use the IB, about their reporting practices for anti-Ro60.
Using the manufacturer's reported cut-off of 15 units, the IB has an analytical sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 99.3% for anti-Ro60 detection. The optimal cut-off to balance sensitivity and specificity was determined to be 5 units with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97.4%. Most laboratories use the manufacturer's specified cut-off (15 units) when determining a positive anti-Ro60 result.
Whilst the commercial IB generally performs well, laboratorians need to be mindful of the limitations of IB in detecting antibodies that recognise conformational epitopes and what cut-offs they use. A vast majority of laboratories could potentially miss detection of this clinically important autoantibody.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 900-903 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Pathology |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- Antibodies
- antinuclear antibodies
- autoantibodies
- line blot
- Ro60
- SSA