Validation of a perfusion registry: methodological approach and initial findings

Theron Paugh, Timothy Dickinson, Patricia Theurer, Gail Bell, Kenneth Shann, Robert Baker, Nicholas Mellas, Richard Prager, Donald Likosky

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Although regional and national registries exist to measure and report performance of cardiac surgical programs, few registries exist dedicated to the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We developed and implemented a cardiovascular perfusion registry (Perfusion Measures and outcomes [PERForm] Registry) within the structure of the Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons (MSTCVS) to improve our understanding of the practice of CPB. The PERForm Registry comprises data elements describing the practice of CPB. Fourteen medical centers within MSTCVS have voluntarily reported these data on procedures in which CPB is used. We validated the case count among procedures performed between January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, and validated the values among 20 fields at three medical centers. We queried database managers at all 14 medical centers to identify the infrastructure that contributed to best overall data collection performance. We found that 98% of all records submitted to the PERForm and 95% of those submitted to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) matched. We found quite favorable agreement in our audit of select fields (95.8%). Those centers with the most favorable performance in this validation study were more likely to use electronic data capture, have a perfusionist as the STS database manager, and have involvement of the STS database manager in the PERForm or STS databases. We successfully and accurately collected data concerning cardiovascular perfusion among 14 institutions in conjunction with the MSTCVS. Future efforts will focus on expanding data collection to all MSTCVS participating institutions as well as more broadly outside of Michigan.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)104-115
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Extracorporeal Technology
    Volume44
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of a perfusion registry: methodological approach and initial findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Paugh, T., Dickinson, T., Theurer, P., Bell, G., Shann, K., Baker, R., Mellas, N., Prager, R., & Likosky, D. (2012). Validation of a perfusion registry: methodological approach and initial findings. Journal of Extracorporeal Technology, 44(3), 104-115.