Validity of self-reported sedentary time differs between Australian rural men engaged in office and farming occupations

James Dollman, Johanna L. Pontt, Alex V. Rowlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rural Australians have a higher likelihood of chronic disease than urban Australians, particularly male farmers. Chronic disease has been associated with occupational sedentary time. The aim was to validate the self-report of sedentary time in men in contrasting rural occupations. Farmers (n = 29) and office workers (n = 28), age 30–65 years, were recruited from the Riverland region of South Australia. Daily sedentary time and number of breaks in sedentary time were self-reported and measured objectively using body-worn inclinometers. Correlational analyses were conducted between self-reported and objectively measured variables, separately by occupation. There was a significant correlation between self-reported and objectively measured sedentary time in the whole sample (r = 0.44, P = 0.001). The correlation among office workers was significant (r = 0.57, P = 0.003) but not among farmers (r = 0.08, P = 0.68). There were no significant correlations between self-reported and measured number of breaks in sedentary time, for the whole sample (rho = −0.03, P = 0.83), office workers (rho = 0.17, P = 0.39) and farmers (rho = −0.22, P = 0.25). In conclusion, the validity of self-report of sedentary behaviours by farmers was poor. Further research is needed to develop better performing self-report instruments or more accessible objective measures of sedentary behaviour in this population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1154-1158
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume34
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adult
  • occupational groups
  • self-report
  • Sitting time
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of self-reported sedentary time differs between Australian rural men engaged in office and farming occupations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this