TY - JOUR
T1 - Valuing active travel
T2 - Including the health benefits of sustainable transport in transportation appraisal frameworks
AU - Mulley, Corinne
AU - Tyson, Rob
AU - McCue, Peter
AU - Rissel, Chris
AU - Munro, Cameron
PY - 2013/7/1
Y1 - 2013/7/1
N2 - Sustainable transport investments linked to improving public transport or designed specifically to improve walking and cycling networks (for example, bicycle infrastructure) typically underestimate the contribution of these active travel modes. This is because the investment appraisal mechanism, social cost benefit analysis, lacks an agreed methodology or well defined parameter values for establishing the demand and the associated health benefits and costs of active travel. Correcting for the acknowledged benefits of walking and cycling (including contributions to achieving physical activity targets and maintaining health) requires an appropriate framework and parameter values to allow these benefits to be captured in a robust and consistent manner. This paper proposes such a framework for the Australian context and a consequent weighted benefit of $1.68. per km (range $1.23-$2.50) for walking and a $1.12. per km (range $0.82-$1.67) for cycling that includes both mortality and morbidity changes resulting from a more active lifestyle. Investigation of the potential health costs associated with motorised travel and reduced physical activity requires further detailed research.
AB - Sustainable transport investments linked to improving public transport or designed specifically to improve walking and cycling networks (for example, bicycle infrastructure) typically underestimate the contribution of these active travel modes. This is because the investment appraisal mechanism, social cost benefit analysis, lacks an agreed methodology or well defined parameter values for establishing the demand and the associated health benefits and costs of active travel. Correcting for the acknowledged benefits of walking and cycling (including contributions to achieving physical activity targets and maintaining health) requires an appropriate framework and parameter values to allow these benefits to be captured in a robust and consistent manner. This paper proposes such a framework for the Australian context and a consequent weighted benefit of $1.68. per km (range $1.23-$2.50) for walking and a $1.12. per km (range $0.82-$1.67) for cycling that includes both mortality and morbidity changes resulting from a more active lifestyle. Investigation of the potential health costs associated with motorised travel and reduced physical activity requires further detailed research.
KW - Active travel
KW - Infrastructure investment
KW - Social cost benefit analysis
KW - Walking and cycling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878578191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.01.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84878578191
SN - 2210-5395
VL - 7
SP - 27
EP - 34
JO - Research in Transportation Business and Management
JF - Research in Transportation Business and Management
ER -