TY - JOUR
T1 - Valuing beach recreation across a regional area
T2 - The Great Barrier Reef in Australia
AU - Rolfe, John
AU - Gregg, Daniel
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - The focus of the research reported in this paper has been to estimate recreation values for beaches over approximately 1,400 km (km) of coastline along the Queensland coast. The study is notable at an international level because it assesses recreation values to a general type of recreation asset rather than to a specific site, and because it focuses on the values of the local resident population. Negative binomial models have been used to estimate both the visit rate and recreation values associated with beach visits in different regional areas. The value of a single beach visit was estimated per person at $35.09, which extrapolates to $587.3 million in beach recreation values per annum. These values are likely to be conservative because opportunity costs incurred to live closer to the beach (e.g. housing premiums) have not been assessed. Contingent behaviour models were used to estimate the values of potential declines in water quality, with marginal effects assessed at $1.30 per recreation trip to avoid each 1% decline in water quality.
AB - The focus of the research reported in this paper has been to estimate recreation values for beaches over approximately 1,400 km (km) of coastline along the Queensland coast. The study is notable at an international level because it assesses recreation values to a general type of recreation asset rather than to a specific site, and because it focuses on the values of the local resident population. Negative binomial models have been used to estimate both the visit rate and recreation values associated with beach visits in different regional areas. The value of a single beach visit was estimated per person at $35.09, which extrapolates to $587.3 million in beach recreation values per annum. These values are likely to be conservative because opportunity costs incurred to live closer to the beach (e.g. housing premiums) have not been assessed. Contingent behaviour models were used to estimate the values of potential declines in water quality, with marginal effects assessed at $1.30 per recreation trip to avoid each 1% decline in water quality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867088474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.019
DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.019
M3 - Article
SN - 0964-5691
VL - 69
SP - 282
EP - 290
JO - Ocean and Coastal Management
JF - Ocean and Coastal Management
ER -