Variations in Patterns of Care of Rectal Cancer Patients in South Australia According to Sociodemographic Characteristics:A Registry Study

Alyssa Ebert, Michala Short, Lettie Pule, Loredana Marcu, Elizabeth Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective. To explore variations in patterns of care over three decades for a subgroup of rectal cancer patients in South Australia according to sociodemographic characteristics. Methods. This study evaluated three decades of retrospective data from the South Australian Clinical Cancer Registry. A total of 4,131 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between 1982 and 2015 and treated in South Australian public hospitals were included. Study outcomes were age at diagnosis, area of primary residence, cancer stage, and primary treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy). Results. There was a significantly lower likelihood of conventional therapy for the elderly. Adjusted odds of receiving surgery or radiotherapy decreased by 70% and those of receiving chemotherapy by 90% in the 80+ age group, compared to the 50-59 age group. No significant variation was detected according to area-level socioeconomic status or remoteness. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors showed little impact on the receipt of therapies for rectal cancer patients in South Australia. Variation in treatment by age, irrespective of disease stage or period of diagnosis, requires further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7974059
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
Volume2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • patterns of care
  • rectal cancer
  • South Australia
  • Sociodemographic characteristics
  • South Australian Clinical Cancer Registry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variations in Patterns of Care of Rectal Cancer Patients in South Australia According to Sociodemographic Characteristics:A Registry Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this