Abstract
I argue the Neuendettelsauer Mission made a strategic choice in the early 1930s to reverse its transnational politics of the 1920s. It did so to make its institution richer, more powerful, and influential. This decision backfired. When the field personnel founded the stronghold, it exposed the fragile and precarious transnational position the home base had manoeuvred itself into, leaving it para- lyzed, unable to act. This paralysis extended to the mission’s representative Otto Theile, and the leadership of the Australian UELCA. The Lutherans involved in mission work were thus powerless, unwilling and unable to assist those under their care when support was critical. It is in the tension between the seeking of power and influence in 1933 and the lack of it when it counted in 1942 that an ethical reading unfolds of the foundation of the Finschhafen stronghold.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 123-143 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | , Interkulturelle Theologie. Zeitschrift für Missionswissenschaft (ZMiss) |
Volume | 2022 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - May 2022 |
Keywords
- National Socialism
- Papua New Guine
- Germany -- Politics and government
- Lutheranism
- colonial history
- Australian History