TY - JOUR
T1 - “We’re Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research”
T2 - A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service
AU - Brown, Amy
AU - Edelman, Alexandra
AU - Pain, Tilley
AU - Larkins, Sarah
AU - Harvey, Gillian
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Research is central to high functioning health services alongside clinical care and health professional training. The impact of embedded research includes delivery of high-quality care and improved patient outcomes. Evaluations of research impact help health service leadership ensure investments lead to the greatest healthcare benefits for patients. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of research investment from 2008 to 2018 at Townsville Hospital and Health Service (THHS), a regional Hospital and Health Service (HHS) in Queensland, Australia. The evaluation also sought to identify contextual conditions that enable or hinder intended impacts.Methods: A mixed-methods realist-informed evaluation was conducted using documentation, interviews with 15 staff and available databases to identify and measure research investments, impacts and contextual conditions influencing impact outcomes.Results: Between 2008 and 2018, THHS increased resources for research by funding research projects, employing research personnel, building research-enabling facilities, hosting research events, and providing research education and training. Clinical practice, policy and workforce impacts were successful in isolated pockets, championed by individual researchers and facilitated by their policy and community-of-practice networks. However, there was little organisational-level support for continuity of research and implementation into practice and policy. Availability of research supports varied geographically across THHS, and across disciplines. Conclusion: Definitive steps in the development of THHS as a credible and productive research centre and leading hospital research centre in Northern Australia are evident. Continuing investments should address support for the research continuum through to translation and establish ongoing, systematic processes for evaluating research investment and impact.
AB - Background: Research is central to high functioning health services alongside clinical care and health professional training. The impact of embedded research includes delivery of high-quality care and improved patient outcomes. Evaluations of research impact help health service leadership ensure investments lead to the greatest healthcare benefits for patients. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of research investment from 2008 to 2018 at Townsville Hospital and Health Service (THHS), a regional Hospital and Health Service (HHS) in Queensland, Australia. The evaluation also sought to identify contextual conditions that enable or hinder intended impacts.Methods: A mixed-methods realist-informed evaluation was conducted using documentation, interviews with 15 staff and available databases to identify and measure research investments, impacts and contextual conditions influencing impact outcomes.Results: Between 2008 and 2018, THHS increased resources for research by funding research projects, employing research personnel, building research-enabling facilities, hosting research events, and providing research education and training. Clinical practice, policy and workforce impacts were successful in isolated pockets, championed by individual researchers and facilitated by their policy and community-of-practice networks. However, there was little organisational-level support for continuity of research and implementation into practice and policy. Availability of research supports varied geographically across THHS, and across disciplines. Conclusion: Definitive steps in the development of THHS as a credible and productive research centre and leading hospital research centre in Northern Australia are evident. Continuing investments should address support for the research continuum through to translation and establish ongoing, systematic processes for evaluating research investment and impact.
KW - Australia
KW - Realist-Informed Evaluation
KW - Regional Hospital
KW - Research Capacity
KW - Research Impact
KW - Research Investment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145033769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6529
DO - 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6529
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145033769
VL - 11
SP - 3000
EP - 3011
JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management
JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management
SN - 2322-5939
IS - 12
ER -