What is an Insurrection? Destituent Power and Ontological Anarchy in Agamben and Stirner

Saul Abraham Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


The aim of this article is to develop a theoretical understanding of the insurrection as a central concept in radical politics in order to account for contemporary movements and forms of mobilisation that seek to withdraw from governing institutions and affirm autonomous practices and forms of life. I will develop a theory of insurrection by investigating the parallel thinking of Giorgio Agamben and Max Stirner. Starting with Stirner’s central distinction between revolution and insurrection, and linking this with Agamben’s theory of destituent power, I show how both thinkers develop an ontologically anarchic approach to ethics, subjectivity and life that is designed to destitute and profane governing institutions and established categories of politics. However, I will argue that Stirner’s ‘egoistic’ and voluntarist approach to insurrection provides a more tangible and positive way of thinking about political action and agency than Agamben’s at times vague, albeit suggestive, notion of inoperativity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-299
Number of pages16
JournalPolitical Studies
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017


  • destituent power
  • Giorgio Agamben
  • insurrection
  • Max Stirner


Dive into the research topics of 'What is an Insurrection? Destituent Power and Ontological Anarchy in Agamben and Stirner'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this