When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.

Mark Huff, Glen Bodner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared the effects of item-specific versus relational encoding on recognition memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. In Experiment 1, we directly compared item-specific and relational encoding instructions, whereas in Experiments 2 and 3 we biased pleasantness and generation tasks, respectively, toward one or the other type of processing. A read condition was tested in each experiment for comparison purposes. Across experiments, item-specific and relational encoding both boosted correct recognition relative to reading, but only item-specific encoding typically reduced false recognition. Signal-detection measures revealed that less information was encoded about critical items after item-specific than after relational encoding. In contrast, item-specific and relational encoding led to equivalent increases in strategic monitoring at test (e.g., use of a distinctiveness heuristic). Thus, monitoring at test was less successful after relational than item-specific encoding because more information had been encoded about critical lures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1246-1256
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this