Who's responsible for the care of women during and after a pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes?

Shelley Wilkinson, Siew Lim, Susan Upham, Andrew Pennington, Sharleen O'Reilly, Dino Asproloupos, Harold McIntyre, James Dunbar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite its increasing incidence and high conferred risk to women and their children, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is managed inconsistently during and after pregnancy due to an absence of a systemic approach to managing these women. New guidelines for GDM testing and diagnosis are based on stronger evidence, but raise concerns about increased workloads and confusion in a landscape of multiple, conflicting guidelines. Postnatal care and long-term preventive measures are particularly fragmented, with no professional group taking responsibility for this crucial role. Clearer guidelines and assistance from existing frameworks, such as the National Gestational Diabetes Register, could enable general practitioners to take ownership of the management of women at risk of type 2 diabetes following GDM, applying the principles of chronic disease management long term.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)S78-S81
    JournalMJA Medical Journal of Australia
    Volume201
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Who's responsible for the care of women during and after a pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this