Why behavioural health promotion endures despite its failure to reduce health inequities

Frances Baum, Ian Fisher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    211 Citations (Scopus)


    Increasing rates of chronic conditions have resulted in governments targeting health behaviour such as smoking, eating high-fat diets, or physical inactivity known to increase risk for these conditions. In the process, many have become preoccupied with disease prevention policies focused excessively and narrowly on behavioural health-promotion strategies. These aim to improve health status by persuading individuals to change their health behaviour. At the same time, health promotion policy often fails to incorporate an understanding of the social determinants of health, which recognises that health behaviour itself is greatly influenced by peoples' environmental, socioeconomic and cultural settings, and that chronic diseases and health behaviour such as smoking are more prevalent among the socially or economically disadvantaged. We identify several reasons why behavioural forms of health promotion are inadequate for addressing social inequities in health and point to a dilemma that, despite these inadequacies and increasing evidence of the social determinants of health, behavioural approaches and policies have strong appeal to governments. In conclusion, the article promotes strategies addressing social determinants that are likely to reduce health inequities. The article also concludes that evidence alone will not result in health policies aimed at equity and that political values and will, and the pressure of civil society are also crucial.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)213-225
    Number of pages13
    JournalSociology of Health and Illness
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014


    • Behavioural theories
    • Health equity
    • Health promotion
    • Social determinants
    • Social inequalities


    Dive into the research topics of 'Why behavioural health promotion endures despite its failure to reduce health inequities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this