Why do we evaluate 30-day readmissions in general medicine? A historical perspective and contemporary data

Jonathan James, Sheryn Tan, Brandon Stretton, Joshua G. Kovoor, Aashray K. Gupta, Samuel Gluck, Toby Gilbert, Yogesh Sharma, Stephen Bacchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
123 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reducing preventable readmissions is important to help manage current strains on healthcare systems. The metric of 30-day readmissions is commonly cited in discussions regarding this topic. While such thresholds have contemporary funding implications, the rationale for individual cut-off points is partially historical in nature. Through the examination of the basis for the analysis of 30-day readmissions, greater insight into the possible benefits and limitations of such a metric may be obtained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1070-1075
Number of pages6
JournalInternal Medicine Journal
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • internal medicine
  • policy
  • readmission
  • reimbursement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why do we evaluate 30-day readmissions in general medicine? A historical perspective and contemporary data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this