TY - JOUR
T1 - Why do we self-punish?
T2 - Perceptions of the motives and impact of self-punishment outside the laboratory
AU - de Vel-Palumbo, Melissa
AU - Woodyatt, Lydia
AU - Wenzel, Michael
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - This study explores perceptions of why people punish themselves in response to feelings of moral failure. Experimental research has posited some of self-punishment's functions, but it remains unclear whether the perceived motives and outcomes for those engaging in spontaneous self-punishment are fundamentally distinct from those in experimental settings. This study explores and interprets laypersons’ experiences of their own self-punishment, using qualitative and quantitative data collected in an online survey. Self-punishers responded to a series of questions examining what kinds of self-punishment behaviours they engage in and why, and their effects on emotions, cognitions, and relationships. Key themes identified via thematic analysis included self-punishment as an emotion regulation strategy, as an opportunity to reflect and learn from the transgression, and the notion that self-punishment becomes normalised. Analysis of these themes suggests that self-punishment can reflect both psychological avoidance and resolution of problems, and that these two functions have different implications for reconciliation. Key message: Our analysis of naturalistic self-punishment experiences revealed dimensions of self-punishment neglected in the empirical literature, in particular the notion of self-punishment as an exploration (rather than an evasion) of one's guilt.
AB - This study explores perceptions of why people punish themselves in response to feelings of moral failure. Experimental research has posited some of self-punishment's functions, but it remains unclear whether the perceived motives and outcomes for those engaging in spontaneous self-punishment are fundamentally distinct from those in experimental settings. This study explores and interprets laypersons’ experiences of their own self-punishment, using qualitative and quantitative data collected in an online survey. Self-punishers responded to a series of questions examining what kinds of self-punishment behaviours they engage in and why, and their effects on emotions, cognitions, and relationships. Key themes identified via thematic analysis included self-punishment as an emotion regulation strategy, as an opportunity to reflect and learn from the transgression, and the notion that self-punishment becomes normalised. Analysis of these themes suggests that self-punishment can reflect both psychological avoidance and resolution of problems, and that these two functions have different implications for reconciliation. Key message: Our analysis of naturalistic self-punishment experiences revealed dimensions of self-punishment neglected in the empirical literature, in particular the notion of self-punishment as an exploration (rather than an evasion) of one's guilt.
KW - guilt
KW - morality
KW - qualitative research
KW - reparation
KW - self-punishment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045714703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2368
DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2368
M3 - Article
SN - 1099-0992
VL - 48
SP - 756
EP - 768
JO - European Journal of Social Psychology
JF - European Journal of Social Psychology
IS - 6
ER -