Why isn't time out being implemented. An exploratory study

B Gillespie, Wendy Chaboyer, M Wallis, Clare Fenwick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background While there has been much discussion extolling the virtues of using 'time out' as a means of preventing the potential for sentinel events, to date there has been little examination of the issues that impact on clinicians' uptake of 'time out' in operating-room settings. Aim This study sought to methodically identify implementation and practice issues associated with the introduction and ongoing use of a 'time out' protocol in a large healthcare organisation. Methods Sixteen participants were interviewed and included surgeons, anaesthetists, nurse managers and nurses who worked at the clinical interface. Textual data were analysed using a grounded theory approach, identifying subcategories to illustrate causal relationships to the category. Results The category 'ambivalent compliance with "time out"' was the central idea that was recognised by events and behaviours that surrounded the introduction of 'time out.' Subcategories included haphazard implementation of time out, hierarchical team culture and tribal affiliations of members, and clashing clinical priorities make it difficult to incorporate 'time out' into practice, and led to 'ambivalent compliance.' Conclusion There is little doubt that using a 'time out' protocol in the operating room allows team members to share explicit confirmation of safety-related details. However, when introducing patient safety initiatives into practice, recognising compliance issues is an important first step towards identifying ways in which to address them.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)103-106
    Number of pages4
    JournalQuality and Safety in Health Care
    Volume19
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2010

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why isn't time out being implemented. An exploratory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this