TY - GEN
T1 - Why Not? Tell us the Reason for Writer Dissimilarity
AU - Adak, Chandranath
AU - Chaudhuri, Bidyut B.
AU - Lin, Chin Teng
AU - Blumenstein, Michael
PY - 2020/9/28
Y1 - 2020/9/28
N2 - Writer verification has drawn significant attention over the past few decades due to its extensive applications in forensics and biometrics. In traditional writer verification, handwriting similarity/dissimilarity analysis is mostly performed by extracting two feature vectors from two respective handwritten samples, followed by comparing them in relation to their similarity. In the state-of-the-art writer verification approaches, a distance metric is usually employed in terms of the similarity between two handwritten samples. If the distance between two handwritten samples is greater than a given threshold, then the samples are assumed to be written by two different writers, otherwise, they are considered to be due to the same writer. In this paper, for the very first time, we propose a model that generates English sentences to explain reasons for writer dissimilarity/similarity. First, our proposed model obtains features from handwritten images by employing a convolutional neural network, verifies the writer using a Siamese architecture, and generates English words using a recurrent neural network. Finally, these two networks are merged using an affine transformation to produce an explanatory sentence in support of writer similarity/dissimilarity. We evaluated our model on a handwritten numeral database of 100 writers and obtained promising results.
AB - Writer verification has drawn significant attention over the past few decades due to its extensive applications in forensics and biometrics. In traditional writer verification, handwriting similarity/dissimilarity analysis is mostly performed by extracting two feature vectors from two respective handwritten samples, followed by comparing them in relation to their similarity. In the state-of-the-art writer verification approaches, a distance metric is usually employed in terms of the similarity between two handwritten samples. If the distance between two handwritten samples is greater than a given threshold, then the samples are assumed to be written by two different writers, otherwise, they are considered to be due to the same writer. In this paper, for the very first time, we propose a model that generates English sentences to explain reasons for writer dissimilarity/similarity. First, our proposed model obtains features from handwritten images by employing a convolutional neural network, verifies the writer using a Siamese architecture, and generates English words using a recurrent neural network. Finally, these two networks are merged using an affine transformation to produce an explanatory sentence in support of writer similarity/dissimilarity. We evaluated our model on a handwritten numeral database of 100 writers and obtained promising results.
KW - Feature extraction
KW - Databases
KW - Training
KW - Biometrics (access control)
KW - Writing
KW - Recurrent neural networks
KW - Measurement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85093825644
U2 - 10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207245
DO - 10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207245
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85093825644
T3 - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
BT - 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2020 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
T2 - 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2020
Y2 - 19 July 2020 through 24 July 2020
ER -