Will housing tenure drive unequal outcomes for Consumer-Directed Care recipients?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Initiatives to promote consumer choice are increasingly a feature of Australian welfare policies and programs. Consumer Directed Care (CDC) for older people and the National Disability Insurance Scheme for people younger than 65 years with a disability are two examples of this move towards consumer choice in policy and program development. The ability for service users to benefit from these programs is premised on the fact that their housing is stable and suitable. Yet, there is evidence that this is not the case, and many older people and people with disabilities experience significant housing challenges and stress. This article focuses on CDC and its implications for one particular group under housing stress – low-income older renters. Might they be at risk of limited access to home care services, and what are the broader local neighbourhood implications of this policy?.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E68-E73
Number of pages6
JournalAustralasian Journal on Ageing
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • aging in place
  • home care services
  • housing
  • social planning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Will housing tenure drive unequal outcomes for Consumer-Directed Care recipients?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this