Abstract
Participatory evaluation gives primacy to the experience of people affected by the policy. How realistic is it for researchers to persuade government of its benefits, given the gap between participatory policy theory and government evaluation practice? We apply this question to the Resident Support Program evaluation. The program coordinates support for people living in boarding houses and hostels in Queensland, Australia. We found that a participatory, longitudinal, formative evaluation process facilitated service user contribution to research outcomes, service experiences and policy implementation. In addition, the values position of participatory research can contribute to managing interest conflict in policy implementation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 207-220 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Social Policy and Society |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 1 Mar 2010 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- disability
- policy
- participation
- inclusion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Will policy makers hear my disability experience? How participatory research contributes to managing interest conflict in policy implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver