Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Work Allocation in Australian Courts: Court Staff and the Judiciary

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article examines the statutory basis of judicial workload allocation, before turning to empirical research findings to investigate the functions performed by the judiciary and the court staff in allocating work. The ultimate responsibility for allocating work in a court rests with the chief judicial officer, either as a specific statutory responsibility or as part of their general responsibility to manage the court. In practice, other judicial officers and court personnel are involved in work allocation. This article reports on findings from extensive empirical research examining the processes of work organisation in Australian courts. This research has identified the centrality of court officials, as well as the responsible judicial officer, in allocating work. This may include allocating cases to courts or lists; assigning judicial officers to courts or lists; or, in some circumstances, allocating specific cases to judicial officers. This process of workload allocation requires these court officials to exercise considerable skill in balancing key principles and values of judicial work organisation, including efficiency, fairness, neutral case allocation, and judicial independence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)669-694
    Number of pages26
    JournalSydney Law Review
    Volume36
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Work Allocation in Australian Courts: Court Staff and the Judiciary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this