Abstract
Across two studies (Ns = 265 and 735), we investigated whether women’s endorsement of hostile (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) moderates their experience of collective threat and subsequent hostility toward traditional and non-traditional female subtypes. As expected, HS was positively associated with intra-gender hostility toward the non-traditional subtype, and these effects were mediated by collective threat. HS was negatively associated with collective threat and hostility toward the traditional subtype, but only when the target endorsed prescriptive gender beliefs that explicitly reinforced gender inequality. BS was associated with collective threat and hostility toward the non-traditional subtype, but these effects did not emerge consistently across both studies. These results suggest that women are not a homogeneous group whose members all find the same subtypes collectively threatening. Rather, the extent to which women internalize patriarchal attitudes and stereotypes influences the behaviors they find threatening and deserving of hostility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1486-1514 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Group Processes and Intergroup Relations |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Early online date | 27 May 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- benevolent sexism
- collective threat
- hostile sexism
- intra-gender hostility
- subtyping
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'You're making us all look bad: Sexism moderates women's experience of collective threat and intra-gender hostility toward traditional and non-traditional female subtypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver